Complete Health Indicator Report of Breast Cancer Screening (Mammography)
Definition
The proportion of women 40 years or older who reported having a mammogram in the last two years.Numerator
The number of women 40 years or older who reported having a mammogram in the last two years.Denominator
The total number of female survey respondents aged 40 or older excluding those who responded "don't know" or "refused" to the numerator question.Data Interpretation Issues
In 2016, age distribution was changed from 8 groupings to 5 groupings; this may affect the interpretation of data trends.Why Is This Important?
Breast cancer is the most commonly occurring cancer in U.S. women (excluding basal and squamous cell skin cancers). It is also the leading cause of female cancer death in Utah. Deaths from breast cancer can be substantially reduced if the tumor is discovered at an early stage. Mammography is currently the best method for detecting cancer early. Clinical trials and observational studies have demonstrated that routine screening with mammography can reduce breast cancer mortality by about 20% for women of average risk.^1^[[br]] [[br]] '''Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations (American Cancer Society):'''[[br]] __Before Age 40__: Women who are at higher than average risk of breast cancer (due to family history of breast cancer, BRCA 1 or 2 genetic mutations, or who received thoracic irradiation between the ages of 10 and 30) should seek expert medical advice about whether they should begin screening before age 40 and the frequency of that screening.[[br]] __Age 40-44__: Women with average risk of developing breast cancer may consider being screened annually for breast cancer. Women at higher risk should consult with their physician.[[br]] __Age 45-54__: Women with average risk of developing breast cancer should be screened annually for breast cancer. Women at higher risk should consult with their physician.[[br]] __Age 55-75__: Women with average risk of developing breast cancer may be screened annually or biennially for breast cancer. Women at higher risk should consult with their physician.[[br]] __Age 76+__: Annual or biennial breast cancer screening should continue for women who are in good health and who are expected to live an additional 10+ years. [[br]] [[br]] If you are age 40 or over, or have a family history of breast cancer, talk to your doctor about the best screening guidelines for you.[[br]] [[br]] ---- ''1. Myers ER, Moorman P, Gierisch JM, et al. Benefits and harms of breast cancer screening. JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.13183.''Healthy People Objective C-17:
Increase the proportion of women who receive a breast cancer screening based on the most recent guidelinesU.S. Target: 81.1 percent
State Target: 76 percent
Other Objectives
CSTE Chronic Disease IndicatorsHow Are We Doing?
Between 1989 and 2020, the percentage of Utah women aged 40 or older who reported receiving a mammogram within the last two years increased from 51.6% to 62.7%. Although rates have increased some over time, the rate in Utah still falls far below the national average. The 2020 breast cancer screening rate in Utah was 62.7%, significantly lower than the U.S. rate of 69.0%. In 2020, TriCounty Local Health District (LHD) had the lowest percentage of mammograms rates, while Summit County LHD had the highest (47.2% and 69.5%, respectively). See additional data views for more specific geographic differences between the Utah Small Areas. For the same year, there were no significant differences in mammography screening rates between Hispanic and non-Hispanic ethnic groups, nor were there any significant differences in rates among different racial groups for combined data years 2018, 2019, and 2020. Mammography rates generally tend to increase as age of the woman, education level of the woman, and amount of household income increases. In 2019 and 2020 combined, women age 40-49 had significantly lower rates of mammography screening (52.8%) than older women (69.3%; most likely due to differing guidelines concerning the age at which breast cancer screening should begin). Looking at the highest level of education completed for the same time period, college graduates were significantly more likely to have received a mammogram (69.1%) than the general population (63.3%). In the same timeframe, women in households with an annual income of less than $25,000 were significantly less likely to have had a mammogram in the past two years (56.3%) compared to other women, whereas women in households with an annual income of more than $75,000 were more likely to have had a mammogram in the past two years (69.0%).How Do We Compare With the U.S.?
Nationally, the percentage of women aged 40 or older who reported receiving a mammogram in the past two years increased from 55.2% in 1989 to 69.0% in 2020. Since 1994, the percentage of Utah women aged 40 or older who reported receiving a mammogram has been below the U.S. rate. In 2020, based on new survey methodology, only 62.7% of Utah women aged 40 and older had received a mammogram in the last two years compared with 69.0% of U.S. women.What Is Being Done?
The Utah Cancer Control Program (UCCP) in the Utah Department of Health (UDOH) provides free breast cancer screening and diagnostics to uninsured or under-insured women ages 40-74 years whose income is at or below the 250% federal poverty level. Women in need of cancer treatment are enrolled into Medicaid as per the Breast and Cervical Cancer Treatment Act. In addition to providing care to under-served women, the UCCP works with health-systems to implement evidence-based practices to improve cancer screening rates. Visit [http://www.cancerutah.org] for more information or to see if you qualify for free mammography services. The Utah Comprehensive Cancer Control program (CCC) and its affiliated coalition, the Utah Cancer Action Network (UCAN), work together with state and local partners to reduce the burden of cancer in Utah. Their mission is to lower cancer incidence, morbidity, and mortality in Utah through collaborative efforts directed toward cancer prevention and control. As a result, they support community-based strategies around food security, healthy neighborhoods, access to health care, and financial toxicity in order to prevent cancer; detect cancer early; and improve the lives of cancer survivors, caregivers, and their families. Additionally, CCC receives funding to implement cancer prevention and control strategies identified by the program and UCAN coalition.Available Services
The Utah Cancer Control Program (UCCP) in the Utah Department of Health (UDOH) provides free breast cancer screening to uninsured or under-insured women ages 40 and older who are at or below the 250% federal poverty level. Women in need of cancer treatment are enrolled into Medicaid as per the Breast and Cervical Cancer Treatment Act. Visit [http://www.cancerutah.org] or call 1-800-717-1811 for more information or to see if you qualify for free mammography services.Related Indicators
Relevant Population Characteristics
Routine screening for breast cancer with mammography has been identified as a priority issue for women 40 years of age or older by several health organizations.Related Relevant Population Characteristics Indicators:
- Utah Population Characteristics: Age Distribution of the Population
- Breast Cancer Deaths
- Breast Cancer Incidence
- Breast Cancer Screening (Mammography)
- Cancer Deaths
- Cervical Cancer Death
- Cervical Cancer Incidence
- Cervical Cancer Screening (Pap)
- Cost as a Barrier to Health Care
- Utah Population Characteristics: Education Level in the Population
- Utah Population Characteristics: Household Income
- Health Insurance Coverage
- Obesity Among Adults
- Utah Population Characteristics: Poverty, All Persons
Health Care System Factors
According to data collected by the Utah Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, use of mammography is lower among women without health insurance compared to women with health insurance. Mammography is a preventive service covered by Medicare.Related Health Care System Factors Indicators:
Risk Factors
The most important risk factor for breast cancer is increasing age. Other established risk factors include personal or family history of breast cancer, history of abnormal breast biopsy, genetic alterations, early age at onset of menses, late age at onset of menopause, never having children or having a first live birth at age 30 or older, and history of exposure to high dose radiation. Associations have also been suggested between breast cancer and oral contraceptives, long-term use of hormone replacement therapy, obesity (in post-menopausal women), alcohol, and a diet high in fat. Some studies suggest that exercise in youth might give life-long protection against breast cancer and that even moderate physical activity as an adult could lower breast cancer risk. More research is needed to confirm these findings.Related Risk Factors Indicators:
- Daily Fruit Consumption
- Daily Vegetable Consumption
- Utah Population Characteristics: Age Distribution of the Population
- Alcohol Consumption - Binge Drinking
- Alcohol Consumption - Heavy Drinking
- Obesity Among Adults
- Overweight or Obese
- Physical Activity: Recommended Aerobic Activity Among Adults
- Physical Activity Among Adolescents
Health Status Outcomes
Routine screening with mammography is an important tool in the early detection of breast cancer and early detection can save lives.Related Health Status Outcomes Indicators:
Graphical Data Views
Mammogram Within the Past Two Years, Utah and U.S., 1989-2020
| BRFSS Utah vs. U.S. | Year | Age-adjusted Percentage of Women Age 40+ | Lower Limit | Upper Limit | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Record Count: 48 | ||||||
| UT Old Methodology | 1989 | 51.6% | 46.6% | 56.5% | ||
| UT Old Methodology | 1990 | 54.8% | 50.0% | 59.5% | ||
| UT Old Methodology | 1991 | 57.9% | 53.1% | 62.8% | ||
| UT Old Methodology | 1992 | 64.0% | 59.7% | 68.3% | ||
| UT Old Methodology | 1993 | 61.6% | 56.9% | 66.2% | ||
| UT Old Methodology | 1994 | 67.4% | 62.7% | 72.0% | ||
| UT Old Methodology | 1995 | 63.1% | 58.9% | 67.3% | ||
| UT Old Methodology | 1996 | 64.4% | 60.7% | 68.2% | ||
| UT Old Methodology | 1997 | 65.0% | 60.7% | 69.3% | ||
| UT Old Methodology | 1998 | 65.7% | 61.3% | 70.1% | ||
| UT Old Methodology | 1999 | 67.3% | 63.3% | 71.3% | ||
| UT Old Methodology | 2000 | 72.6% | 68.9% | 76.3% | ||
| UT Old Methodology | 2002 | 68.8% | 65.5% | 72.0% | ||
| UT Old Methodology | 2004 | 66.4% | 63.7% | 69.1% | ||
| UT Old Methodology | 2006 | 67.8% | 65.3% | 70.2% | ||
| UT Old Methodology | 2008 | 67.2% | 64.5% | 69.8% | ||
| UT Old Methodology | 2010 | 66.4% | 64.5% | 68.2% | ||
| US Old Methodology | 1989 | 55.2% | 54.1% | 56.3% | ||
| US Old Methodology | 1990 | 58.8% | 57.7% | 59.8% | ||
| US Old Methodology | 1991 | 63.2% | 62.3% | 64.1% | ||
| US Old Methodology | 1992 | 63.5% | 62.7% | 64.3% | ||
| US Old Methodology | 1993 | 66.8% | 56.9% | 66.2% | ||
| US Old Methodology | 1994 | 66.8% | 66.0% | 67.5% | ||
| US Old Methodology | 1995 | 69.8% | 69.0% | 70.5% | ||
| US Old Methodology | 1996 | 70.0% | 69.3% | 70.6% | ||
| US Old Methodology | 1997 | 71.1% | 70.4% | 71.7% | ||
| US Old Methodology | 1998 | 72.3% | 71.0% | 73.7% | ||
| US Old Methodology | 1999 | 74.1% | 73.5% | 74.6% | ||
| US Old Methodology | 2000 | 76.6% | 76.0% | 77.1% | ||
| US Old Methodology | 2002 | 76.0% | 75.4% | 76.5% | ||
| US Old Methodology | 2004 | 74.2% | 73.8% | 74.7% | ||
| US Old Methodology | 2006 | 76.1% | 75.7% | 76.6% | ||
| US Old Methodology | 2008 | 76.2% | 75.9% | 76.6% | ||
| US Old Methodology | 2010 | 74.9% | 74.5% | 75.2% | ||
| UT New Methodology | 2010 | 64.5% | 62.6% | 66.4% | ||
| UT New Methodology | 2011 | 66.8% | 64.0% | 69.5% | ||
| UT New Methodology | 2012 | 68.0% | 66.2% | 69.7% | ||
| UT New Methodology | 2013 | 66.2% | 63.5% | 68.9% | ||
| UT New Methodology | 2014 | 64.8% | 63.1% | 66.4% | ||
| UT New Methodology | 2016 | 65.4% | 63.3% | 67.5% | ||
| UT New Methodology | 2018 | 63.1% | 61.0% | 65.1% | ||
| UT New Methodology | 2019 | 64.0% | 61.1% | 66.7% | ||
| UT New Methodology | 2020 | 62.7% | 60.6% | 64.7% | ||
| US New Methodology | 2012 | 73.2% | 72.8% | 73.7% | ||
| US New Methodology | 2014 | 72.5% | 72.1% | 72.9% | ||
| US New Methodology | 2016 | 71.0% | 70.5% | 71.5% | ||
| US New Methodology | 2018 | 70.9% | 70.3% | 71.4% | ||
| US New Methodology | 2020 | 69.0% | 68.4% | 69.7% | ||
Data Notes
Age-adjusted to U.S. 2000 standard population. Data provided for all years available. Old Methodology: Previous BRFSS methodology used "post-stratification" which was used to weight data by age, gender, and local health district (LHD). New Methodology: To reduce bias and more accurately represent population data, the BRFSS has changed survey methodology. It began conducting surveys by cellular phone in addition to landline phones. It also adopted "iterative proportional fitting" (raking) as its weighting method. With raking, education, race/ethnicity, marital status, home ownership/renter, and telephone source are included in the weighting procedure. Due to changes in sampling and weighting methodology, data from the new methodology represents a new baseline, and comparisons from new to old methodology data are not appropriate.Data Sources
- Utah Data: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Office of Public Health Assessment, Utah Department of Health
- U.S. Data: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), Division of Behavioral Surveillance, CDC Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services
Mammogram Within the Past Two Years by Local Health District, Utah, 2020
| Local Health District | Age-adjusted Percentage of Women Age 40+ | Lower Limit | Upper Limit | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Record Count: 14 | ||||||
| Bear River | 67.8% | 59.6% | 75.1% | |||
| Central | 63.1% | 54.3% | 71.1% | |||
| Davis County | 67.3% | 61.4% | 72.8% | |||
| Salt Lake County | 61.2% | 57.5% | 64.8% | |||
| San Juan | 56.0% | 33.9% | 76.0% | |||
| Southeast | 63.5% | 52.9% | 72.9% | |||
| Southwest | 61.9% | 53.5% | 69.7% | |||
| Summit | 69.5% | 55.8% | 80.4% | |||
| Tooele | 65.7% | 53.7% | 76.0% | |||
| TriCounty | 47.2% | 37.6% | 56.9% | |||
| Utah County | 64.4% | 59.5% | 69.0% | |||
| Wasatch | 68.5% | 57.2% | 77.9% | |||
| Weber-Morgan | 58.8% | 51.8% | 65.5% | |||
| State of Utah | 62.7% | 60.6% | 64.7% | |||
Data Notes
Age-adjusted to the U.S. 2000 standard population.Data Source
Utah Data: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Office of Public Health Assessment, Utah Department of HealthMammogram Within the Past Two Years by Utah Small Area, 2019 and 2020
| Utah Small Areas | Age-adjusted Percentage of Women Age 40+ | Lower Limit | Upper Limit | Note | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Record Count: 100 | ||||||
| Brigham City | 64.8% | 48.7% | 78.2% | |||
| Box Elder Co (Other) V2 | 64.4% | 38.9% | 83.7% | * | ||
| Tremonton | ** | ** | ||||
| Logan V2 | 69.2% | 54.6% | 80.7% | |||
| North Logan | 59.4% | 43.7% | 73.4% | * | ||
| Cache (Other)/Rich (All) V2 | 68.9% | 53.4% | 81.1% | |||
| Hyrum | ** | ** | ||||
| Smithfield | 66.3% | 43.3% | 83.5% | * | ||
| Ben Lomond | 61.8% | 50.0% | 72.4% | |||
| Weber County (East) | 65.6% | 51.4% | 77.4% | |||
| Morgan County | 56.2% | 37.9% | 73.0% | * | ||
| Ogden (Downtown) | 48.6% | 36.5% | 60.8% | |||
| South Ogden | 58.3% | 39.7% | 74.8% | |||
| Roy/Hooper | 78.2% | 65.6% | 87.0% | |||
| Riverdale | 82.5% | 65.4% | 92.2% | * | ||
| Clearfield Area/Hooper | 62.4% | 50.7% | 72.9% | |||
| Layton/South Weber | 59.6% | 48.6% | 69.7% | |||
| Kaysville/Fruit Heights | 66.6% | 50.5% | 79.6% | |||
| Syracuse | 69.8% | 54.4% | 81.8% | |||
| Centerville | 49.8% | 28.3% | 71.3% | |||
| Farmington | 64.7% | 41.8% | 82.4% | * | ||
| North Salt Lake | 77.6% | 55.6% | 90.6% | * | ||
| Woods Cross/West Bountiful | ** | ** | ||||
| Bountiful | 59.4% | 44.9% | 72.4% | |||
| SLC (Rose Park) | 75.1% | 54.8% | 88.3% | * | ||
| SLC (Avenues) | 80.3% | 62.0% | 91.1% | * | ||
| SLC (Foothill/East Bench) | 79.4% | 59.2% | 91.1% | * | ||
| Magna | 44.0% | 26.9% | 62.7% | |||
| SLC (Glendale) V2 | 36.9% | 22.1% | 54.5% | * | ||
| West Valley (Center) | 63.4% | 43.6% | 79.6% | |||
| West Valley (West) V2 | 64.6% | 46.5% | 79.3% | |||
| West Valley (East) V2 | 51.6% | 34.8% | 68.1% | |||
| SLC (Downtown) V2 | 54.7% | 34.4% | 73.6% | |||
| SLC (Southeast Liberty) | 55.5% | 34.5% | 74.6% | |||
| South Salt Lake | 55.3% | 37.3% | 72.0% | * | ||
| SLC (Sugar House) | 58.5% | 43.0% | 72.4% | |||
| Millcreek (South) | 68.5% | 55.1% | 79.4% | |||
| Millcreek (East) | 72.4% | 51.4% | 86.7% | * | ||
| Holladay V2 | 71.1% | 52.0% | 84.8% | |||
| Cottonwood | 66.7% | 53.6% | 77.7% | |||
| Kearns V2 | 50.0% | 33.3% | 66.8% | |||
| Taylorsville (E)/Murray (W) | 69.2% | 53.2% | 81.5% | |||
| Taylorsville (West) | 64.0% | 49.7% | 76.2% | |||
| Murray | 54.0% | 35.7% | 71.2% | |||
| Midvale | 74.7% | 50.3% | 89.7% | * | ||
| West Jordan (Northeast) V2 | 47.9% | 29.7% | 66.6% | |||
| West Jordan (Southeast) | 67.4% | 50.2% | 81.0% | |||
| West Jordan (W)/Copperton | 68.4% | 50.3% | 82.2% | |||
| South Jordan V2 | 73.8% | 60.9% | 83.6% | |||
| Daybreak | 65.4% | 47.9% | 79.4% | |||
| Sandy (West) | 52.8% | 29.8% | 74.7% | |||
| Sandy (Center) V2 | 68.8% | 55.8% | 79.4% | |||
| Sandy (Northeast) | 84.2% | 63.8% | 94.1% | * | ||
| Sandy (Southeast) | ** | ** | ||||
| Draper | 66.5% | 51.5% | 78.8% | |||
| Riverton/Bluffdale | 71.4% | 60.3% | 80.4% | |||
| Herriman | 78.0% | 64.0% | 87.5% | |||
| Tooele County (Other) | 52.2% | 36.6% | 67.5% | |||
| Tooele Valley | 67.9% | 56.0% | 77.8% | |||
| Eagle Mountain/Cedar Valley | 53.0% | 30.6% | 74.2% | |||
| Lehi | 66.2% | 53.7% | 76.7% | |||
| Saratoga Springs | 61.9% | 44.5% | 76.7% | |||
| American Fork | 58.5% | 47.0% | 69.1% | |||
| Alpine | ** | ** | ||||
| Pleasant Grove/Lindon | 53.2% | 41.6% | 64.4% | |||
| Orem (North) | 71.9% | 51.3% | 86.1% | |||
| Orem (West) | 59.9% | 39.6% | 77.3% | |||
| Orem (East) | 59.5% | 45.8% | 72.0% | |||
| Provo/BYU | 64.0% | 47.9% | 77.4% | |||
| Provo (West City Center) | 54.2% | 38.3% | 69.3% | |||
| Provo (East City Center) | 81.2% | 61.5% | 92.1% | * | ||
| Salem City | 58.2% | 31.0% | 81.1% | * | ||
| Spanish Fork | 59.4% | 44.9% | 72.5% | |||
| Springville | 69.9% | 49.1% | 84.8% | |||
| Mapleton | ** | ** | ||||
| Utah County (South) V2 | 61.8% | 41.4% | 78.8% | * | ||
| Payson | 53.1% | 34.9% | 70.6% | |||
| Park City | 74.2% | 60.5% | 84.4% | |||
| Summit County (East) | 66.6% | 50.1% | 79.8% | |||
| Wasatch County | 70.5% | 58.5% | 80.2% | |||
| Daggett and Uintah County | 54.3% | 43.6% | 64.6% | |||
| Duchesne County | 48.3% | 34.5% | 62.3% | |||
| Nephi/Mona | 70.7% | 54.1% | 83.2% | * | ||
| Delta/Fillmore | 46.6% | 27.3% | 67.0% | |||
| Sanpete Valley | 53.4% | 43.1% | 63.4% | |||
| Central (Other) | 64.1% | 52.8% | 74.0% | |||
| Richfield/Monroe/Salina | 45.6% | 32.5% | 59.3% | |||
| Carbon County | 65.2% | 52.4% | 76.1% | |||
| Emery County | 62.6% | 41.8% | 79.5% | |||
| Grand County | 52.8% | 31.0% | 73.6% | |||
| Blanding/Monticello | 58.7% | 42.8% | 72.9% | |||
| San Juan County (Other) | 38.7% | 20.7% | 60.4% | |||
| St. George | 55.4% | 43.9% | 66.4% | |||
| Washington Co (Other) V2 | 49.8% | 27.3% | 72.4% | |||
| Washington City | 69.4% | 47.9% | 84.8% | |||
| Hurricane/La Verkin | 58.2% | 38.7% | 75.4% | |||
| Ivins/Santa Clara | 86.7% | 69.6% | 94.9% | * | ||
| Cedar City | 61.7% | 45.4% | 75.7% | |||
| Southwest LHD (Other) | 56.0% | 41.5% | 69.6% | |||
| State of Utah | 63.3% | 61.6% | 65.0% | |||
Data Notes
Age-adjusted to U.S. 2000 standard population. *Use caution in interpreting; the estimate has a coefficient of variation >30% and is therefore deemed unreliable by Utah Department of Health standards. **The estimate has been suppressed because 1) The relative standard error is greater than 50% or when the relative standard error can't be determined. Consider aggregating years to decrease the relative standard error and improve the reliability of the estimate. 2) the observed number of events is very small and not appropriate for publication, or 3) it could be used to calculate the number in a cell that has been suppressed. ^Use caution in interpreting, only 2 responses collected in area Small area groupings were changed in 2018 to better reflect the boundaries of those areas. This may affect interpretation of trend data.[[br]] Methods and changes to Utah Small Areas may be found on IBIS at the following URL: [https://ibis.health.utah.gov/resource/Guidelines.html].Data Source
Utah Data: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Office of Public Health Assessment, Utah Department of HealthMammogram Within the Past Two Years by Ethnicity, Utah, 2020
| Hispanic Ethnicity | Age-adjusted Percentage of Women Age 40+ | Lower Limit | Upper Limit | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Record Count: 3 | ||||||
| Hispanic | 68.4% | 60.4% | 75.5% | |||
| Non-Hispanic | 62.0% | 59.9% | 64.1% | |||
| All Utahns | 62.7% | 60.6% | 64.7% | |||
Data Notes
Age-adjusted to the U.S. 2000 standard population.Data Source
Utah Data: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Office of Public Health Assessment, Utah Department of HealthMammogram Within the Past Two Years by Race, Utah, 2018, 2019, and 2020 combined data
| Race | Age-adjusted Percentage of Women Age 40+ | Lower Limit | Upper Limit | Note | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Record Count: 7 | ||||||
| American Indian/Native Alaskan | 64.6% | 52.0% | 75.4% | |||
| Asian | 72.5% | 57.4% | 83.7% | |||
| Black | 72.4% | 56.6% | 84.0% | |||
| Pacific Islander | 79.8% | 60.8% | 91.0% | * | ||
| White | 62.8% | 61.4% | 64.2% | |||
| Two or More Races | 66.9% | 60.3% | 73.0% | |||
| All Races | 63.2% | 60.3% | 73.0% | |||
Data Notes
Age-adjusted to the U.S. 2000 standard population using 3 age groups. *Use caution in interpreting; the estimate has a coefficient of variation > 30% and is therefore deemed unreliable by Utah Department of Health standards. Consider aggregating years to decrease the relative standard error and improve the reliability of the estimate.Data Source
Utah Data: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Office of Public Health Assessment, Utah Department of HealthMammogram Within the Past Two Years by Education, Utah Women, 2019 and 2020
| Education Level | Age-adjusted Percentage of Women Age 40+ | Lower Limit | Upper Limit | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Record Count: 5 | ||||||
| Less Than High School | 55.6% | 46.4% | 64.4% | |||
| H.S. Grad or G.E.D. | 59.3% | 55.4% | 63.1% | |||
| Some Post High School | 62.2% | 59.4% | 65.0% | |||
| College Graduate | 69.1% | 66.6% | 71.6% | |||
| Total | 63.3% | 61.6% | 65.0% | |||
Data Notes
Age-adjusted to U.S. 2000 standard population.Data Source
Utah Data: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Office of Public Health Assessment, Utah Department of HealthMammogram Within the Past Two Years by Income, Utah, 2019 and 2020
| Income Category | Age-adjusted Percentage of Women Age 40+ | Lower Limit | Upper Limit | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Record Count: 5 | ||||||
| <$25,000 | 56.3% | 50.5% | 61.9% | |||
| $25,000-$49,999 | 59.4% | 54.4% | 64.2% | |||
| $50,000-$74,999 | 62.9% | 58.5% | 67.1% | |||
| $75,000+ | 69.0% | 66.3% | 71.5% | |||
| Total | 63.3% | 61.6% | 65.0% | |||
Data Notes
Age-adjusted to U.S. 2000 standard population.Data Source
Utah Data: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Office of Public Health Assessment, Utah Department of HealthMammogram Within the Past Two Years by Age Group, Utah, 2019 and 2020
| Age Group | Percentage of Women | Lower Limit | Upper Limit | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Record Count: 3 | ||||||
| Age 40-49 | 52.8% | 49.3% | 56.3% | |||
| Age 50-64 | 68.9% | 66.1% | 71.6% | |||
| Age 65+ | 69.8% | 67.3% | 72.2% | |||
Data Source
Utah Data: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Office of Public Health Assessment, Utah Department of HealthReferences and Community Resources
Utah Cancer Control Program @ [http://www.cancerutah.org][[br]] Utah Cancer Action Network @ [http://www.ucan.cc][[br]] Susan G. Komen Foundation @ [http://www.komen.org][[br]] National Cancer Institute @ [http://www.cancer.gov][[br]] American Cancer Society @ [http://www.cancer.org][[br]] Huntsman Cancer Institute @ [http://www.huntsmancancer.org][[br]] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention @ [http://www.cdc.gov][[br]] American Society of Clinical Oncology @ [http://www.asco.org][[br]]More Resources and Links
Evidence-based community health improvement ideas and interventions may be found at the following sites:Additional indicator data by state and county may be found on these Websites:
- CDC Prevention Status Reports for all 50 states
- County Health Rankings
- Kaiser Family Foundation's StateHealthFacts.org
- CDC WONDER DATA2010, the Healthy People 2010 Database.
Medical literature can be queried at the PubMed website.
Page Content Updated On 11/04/2021,
Published on 01/13/2022
