Skip directly to searchSkip directly to the site navigationSkip directly to the page's main content

Complete Health Indicator Report of Utah Population Characteristics: Poverty, All Persons

Definition

The percentage of persons living in households whose income is at or below the federal poverty threshold.

Numerator

Estimated number of persons living in households whose income is at or below the federal poverty threshold as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau.

Denominator

Estimated number of persons in the population.

Data Interpretation Issues

Poverty status is determined by comparing annual income to a set of dollar values called thresholds that vary by family size, number of children, and age of householder. If a family's before tax money income is less than the dollar value of their threshold, then that family and every individual in it are considered to be in poverty. For people not living in families, poverty status is determined by comparing the individual's income to his or her threshold. The poverty threshold for a family of four including two children was $24,339 in 2016. Poverty thresholds are updated annually to allow for changes in the cost of living using the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U). They do not vary geographically.

Why Is This Important?

Poverty takes into account both income and family size, and has both immediate and long-lasting effects on health. Income provides an assessment of the financial resources available to individual persons or families for basic necessities (e.g., food, clothing, and health care) to maintain or improve their well-being. Persons living in poverty are worse off than persons in more affluent households for many of the indicators tracked by the Utah Department of Health.

Healthy People Objective SDOH-3.1:

Proportion of persons living in poverty
U.S. Target: Not applicable; this measure is being tracked for informational purposes.

Other Objectives

CSTE Chronic Disease Indicator - Poverty

How Are We Doing?

According to the American Community Survey (ACS), approximately 10.2% of Utah residents, or 306,902 Utahns, were living in poverty in 2016. This includes 100,801 children aged 17 and under.

What Is Being Done?

Health care "safety net" programs, such as Medicaid, CHIP (Children's Health Insurance Plan), and the Primary Care Network (PCN) provide some relief to those who are eligible. Utah's community health centers also fill a critical niche in providing high-quality health care services to Utahns of any income level. Programs such as Head Start and those that provide assistance linking people with jobs aim to reduce poverty by increasing social functioning and self-sufficiency. Other programs, such as minimum wage requirements, food stamps, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), and government subsidized health insurance and child care, provide assistance to families needing additional support.

Available Services

Utah Department of Workforce Services[[br]] P.O. Box 45249[[br]] Salt Lake City, UT 84145-0249[[br]] Phone: (801) 526-WORK (9675)[[br]] Fax: (801) 526-9211[[br]] Email: dwscontactus@utah.gov[[br]] [http://jobs.utah.gov/]


Related Indicators

Relevant Population Characteristics

Health status and access to health care services are strongly related to income and poverty.

Related Relevant Population Characteristics Indicators:


Health Care System Factors

People living in poverty are less likely to have health insurance coverage and often find it more difficult to pay for needed medical care. Some literature suggests that they are more likely to be hospitalized for conditions that should have been controlled in the outpatient setting ("ambulatory care sensitive conditions" or ACSCs).

Related Health Care System Factors Indicators:


Risk Factors

Being in poor mental or physical health can influence an individual's ability to be employed. People with little education are less likely to earn a living wage.

Related Risk Factors Indicators:


Health Status Outcomes

People living in poverty are worse off than those in more affluent households for many of the Indicator Reports included here.

Related Health Status Outcomes Indicators:




Graphical Data Views

Percentage of Persons Living in Poverty, Utah and U.S., 1980-2016

::chart - missing::
confidence limits

The data for this graph come from the Current Population Survey (CPS) for years 1980-2007 and from the American Community Survey (ACS) for years 2008-2016.
Utah vs. U.S.YearPercentage of PersonsLower LimitUpper Limit
Record Count: 74
Utah198010.0%7.8%12.2%
Utah198112.2%9.8%14.6%
Utah198214.5%12.0%17.0%
Utah198313.5%11.8%15.2%
Utah198411.1%8.9%13.3%
Utah198510.9%9.3%12.5%
Utah198612.6%10.9%14.3%
Utah198710.2%8.7%11.7%
Utah19889.8%8.3%11.3%
Utah19898.2%6.8%9.6%
Utah19908.2%6.8%9.6%
Utah199112.9%11.2%14.6%
Utah19929.4%8.0%10.8%
Utah199310.7%9.2%12.2%
Utah19948.0%6.7%9.3%
Utah19958.4%7.1%9.7%
Utah19967.7%6.4%9.0%
Utah19978.9%7.6%10.0%
Utah19989.0%7.7%10.3%
Utah19995.7%4.6%6.8%
Utah20007.6%6.8%8.4%
Utah200110.5%9.5%11.5%
Utah20029.9%8.9%10.9%
Utah20039.1%8.2%10.0%
Utah200410.1%9.1%11.1%
Utah20059.2%8.2%10.2%
Utah20069.3%8.3%10.3%
Utah20079.6%8.6%10.6%
Utah20089.7%9.4%10.0%
Utah200911.5%11.0%12.0%
Utah201013.2%12.7%13.7%
Utah201113.5%12.8%14.2%
Utah201212.8%12.1%13.5%
Utah201312.7%12.1%13.3%
Utah201411.7%11.1%12.3%
Utah201511.3%10.8%11.8%
Utah201610.2%9.7%10.7%
U.S.198013.0%
U.S.198114.0%
U.S.198215.0%
U.S.198315.2%
U.S.198414.4%
U.S.198514.0%
U.S.198613.6%
U.S.198713.4%
U.S.198813.0%
U.S.198912.8%
U.S.199013.5%
U.S.199114.2%
U.S.199214.8%
U.S.199315.1%
U.S.199414.5%
U.S.199513.8%
U.S.199613.7%
U.S.199713.3%
U.S.199812.7%
U.S.199911.9%
U.S.200011.3%
U.S.200111.7%
U.S.200212.1%
U.S.200312.5%12.4%12.6%
U.S.200412.7%12.6%12.8%
U.S.200512.6%12.5%12.7%
U.S.200612.3%12.2%12.4%
U.S.200712.5%12.4%12.6%
U.S.200813.2%13.1%13.3%
U.S.200914.3%14.2%14.4%
U.S.201015.3%15.2%15.4%
U.S.201115.9%15.8%16.0%
U.S.201215.9%15.8%16.0%
U.S.201315.8%15.7%15.9%
U.S.201415.5%15.4%15.6%
U.S.201514.7%14.6%14.8%
U.S.201614.0%13.9%14.1%

Data Notes

Both the ACS and CPS data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value.

Data Sources

  • U.S. Current Population Survey
  • American Community Survey


Percentage of Persons Living in Poverty by Age and Sex, Utah, 2016

::chart - missing::
confidence limits

Data from the 2016 American Community Survey (ACS) 1-year estimates.
Males vs. FemalesAge GroupPercentage of PersonsLower LimitUpper Limit
Record Count: 26
Male0-4 years13.2%11.5%14.9%
Male5 years11.0%7.8%14.2%
Male6-11 years12.2%10.5%13.9%
Male12-14 years8.8%7.3%10.3%
Male15 years7.7%5.2%10.2%
Male16-17 years8.5%6.2%10.8%
Male18-24 years17.9%15.2%20.6%
Male25-34 years8.5%7.5%9.5%
Male35-44 years6.6%5.6%7.6%
Male45-54 years6.2%5.2%7.2%
Male55-64 years5.9%4.8%7.0%
Male65-74 years4.0%3.2%4.8%
Male75+ years5.3%4.0%6.6%
Female0-4 years12.9%11.1%14.7%
Female5 years14.4%11.1%17.7%
Female6-11 years10.4%8.9%11.9%
Female12-14 years8.8%7.1%10.5%
Female15 years9.6%6.4%12.8%
Female16-17 years9.4%7.2%11.6%
Female18-24 years24.5%22.0%27.0%
Female25-34 years11.4%10.4%12.4%
Female35-44 years8.8%7.6%10.0%
Female45-54 years8.0%6.8%9.2%
Female55-64 years6.6%5.6%7.6%
Female65-74 years6.6%5.6%7.6%
Female75+ years11.1%9.0%13.2%

Data Notes

The ACS data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. 2016 American Community Survey (ACS) 1-year Table B17001 estimates.

Data Sources

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census
  • American Community Survey


Percentage of Persons Living in Poverty by County, Utah, 2016

::chart - missing::
confidence limits

Data for this graph are based on the 2016 Model-based Small Area Income & Poverty Estimates (SAIPE) for School Districts, Counties, and States.
CountyPercentage of PersonsLower LimitUpper Limit
Record Count: 31
Beaver8.9%6.8%11.0%
Box Elder9.5%7.8%11.2%
Cache12.8%11.2%14.4%
Carbon15.2%12.3%18.1%
Daggett8.2%6.3%10.1%
Davis6.3%5.3%7.3%
Duchesne13.8%11.6%16.0%
Emery12.4%9.8%15.0%
Garfield10.9%8.6%13.2%
Grand12.7%9.9%15.5%
Iron18.4%15.6%21.2%
Juab10.6%8.5%12.7%
Kane10.6%8.2%13.0%
Millard11.2%8.5%13.9%
Morgan4.3%3.3%5.3%
Piute17.7%13.6%21.8%
Rich9.3%7.2%11.4%
Salt Lake9.4%8.6%10.2%
San Juan31.0%26.7%35.3%
Sanpete16.8%13.9%19.7%
Sevier13.8%11.2%16.4%
Summit6.0%4.9%7.1%
Tooele8.1%6.6%9.6%
Uintah11.4%9.2%13.6%
Utah11.4%10.4%12.4%
Wasatch5.5%4.2%6.8%
Washington12.5%10.7%14.3%
Wayne14.8%11.5%18.1%
Weber10.8%9.5%12.1%
State10.2%9.8%10.6%
U.S.14.0%13.9%14.1%

Data Notes

For information on how SAIPE estimates are created, please see: [https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/saipe/technical-documentation/methodology.html].

Data Source

U.S. Census Bureau Small Area Income & Poverty Estimates, Model-based Estimates for States, Counties, & School Districts


Persons Living in Poverty by Local Health District, Utah, 2016

::chart - missing::
confidence limits

Local Health DistrictPercentage of PersonsLower LimitUpper Limit
Record Count: 15
Bear River11.7%10.5%12.9%
Central14.1%12.7%15.5%
Davis County6.3%5.3%7.3%
Salt Lake County9.4%8.6%10.2%
San Juan31.0%26.7%35.3%
Southeast13.9%12.2%15.6%
Southwest13.6%12.2%15.0%
Summit6.0%4.9%7.1%
Tooele8.1%6.6%9.6%
TriCounty12.2%10.6%13.8%
Utah County11.4%10.4%12.4%
Wasatch5.5%4.2%6.8%
Weber-Morgan10.6%9.4%11.8%
State of Utah10.2%9.8%10.6%
U.S.14.0%13.9%14.1%

Data Notes

Data for this graph are based on the 2015 Model-based Small Area Income & Poverty Estimates (SAIPE) for School Districts, Counties, and States. The poverty threshold for a family of four including two children was $24,339 in 2016. ([https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/income-poverty/historical-poverty-thresholds.html])

Data Source

U.S. Census Bureau Small Area Income & Poverty Estimates, Model-based Estimates for States, Counties, & School Districts


Percentage of Persons Living in Poverty by Utah Small Area, 2012-2016 ACS 5-year estimate

::chart - missing::
confidence limits

Utah Small AreasPercentage of PersonsLower LimitUpper LimitNote
Record Count: 70
Brigham City8.5%6.8%10.2%
Box Elder Co (Other)11.8%10.5%13.1%
Logan19.5%17.8%21.2%
Cache Co (Oth)/Rich Co (All)8.2%7.0%9.4%
Ben Lomond12.6%11.0%14.2%
Morgan Co (All)/Weber Co (E)4.7%3.6%5.8%
Ogden (Downtown)19.7%17.1%22.3%
South Ogden16.4%13.7%19.1%
Roy/Hooper10.1%7.9%12.3%
Riverdale9.3%7.5%11.1%
Clearfield/Hill AFB8.8%7.5%10.1%
Layton9.6%8.3%10.9%
Syracuse/Kaysville4.9%3.5%6.3%
Farmington/Centerville3.3%2.3%4.3%
Woods Cross/North Salt Lake7.3%5.1%9.5%
Bountiful6.8%5.4%8.2%
SLC (Rose Park)22.2%18.9%25.5%
SLC (Avenues)11.7%9.5%13.9%
SLC (Foothill/U of U)9.3%7.4%11.2%
Magna11.4%9.4%13.4%
SLC (Glendale)29.8%25.6%34.0%
West Valley (West)13.7%11.6%15.8%
West Valley (East) V221.7%18.8%24.6%
SLC (Downtown)18.1%16.5%19.7%
South Salt Lake28.0%23.4%32.6%
Millcreek10.1%8.5%11.7%
Holladay6.5%5.5%7.5%
Cottonwood6.1%4.6%7.6%
Kearns V210.9%8.9%12.9%
Taylorsville (E)/Murray (W)13.9%11.3%16.5%
Taylorsville (West)**
Murray13.3%10.9%15.7%
Midvale16.7%14.0%19.4%
West Jordan (NE) V29.1%6.7%11.5%
West Jordan (SE)7.9%6.4%9.4%
West Jordan (W)/Copperton7.5%6.0%9.0%
South Jordan3.4%2.5%4.3%
Sandy (Center)7.1%5.9%8.3%
Sandy (NE)3.3%2.2%4.4%
Sandy (SE)6.5%4.5%8.5%
Riverton/Draper4.8%3.8%5.8%
Tooele Co7.2%6.1%8.3%*
Lehi/Cedar Valley5.1%4.3%5.9%
American Fork/Alpine6.4%5.3%7.5%
Pleasant Grove/Lindon10.4%8.6%12.2%
Orem (North)18.0%15.7%20.3%
Orem (West)17.7%15.0%20.4%
Orem (East)8.9%6.9%10.9%
Provo (North)/BYU21.9%19.9%23.9%
Provo (South)30.2%28.2%32.2%
Springville/Spanish Fork7.1%6.2%8.0%
Utah Co (South)8.7%7.3%10.1%
Summit Co7.9%6.6%9.2%*
Wasatch Co8.8%6.6%11.4%*
TriCounty LHD10.6%9.6%11.6%
Juab/Millard/Sanpete Co15.0%13.5%16.5%
Sevier/Piute/Wayne Co14.5%12.5%16.5%
Carbon/Emery Co14.5%13.0%16.0%
Grand County17.0%12.1%21.9%*
San Juan County27.6%25.2%30.0%*
St George15.3%13.5%17.1%
Washington Co (Other)16.4%14.6%18.2%
Cedar City22.2%19.3%25.1%
Southwest LHD (Other)12.6%10.8%14.4%
State10.2%9.8%10.6%
U.S.14.0%13.9%14.1%

Data Notes

Confidence intervals are 90%. *Small areas that are also counties use the ACS county estimate. **The ACS uses 5-digit ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) based on boundaries from the 2010 Census. Some Small Areas consist of ZIP Codes that were introduced after 2010; therefore, data are not available for these Small Areas from the ACS. A description of the Utah Small Areas may be found on IBIS at the following URL: [https://ibis.health.utah.gov/resource/Guidelines.html].

Data Sources

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census
  • American Community Survey


Percentage of Persons Living in Poverty by Race, Utah, 2016

::chart - missing::
confidence limits

Data from the 2016 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates.
RacePercentage of PersonsLower LimitUpper Limit
Record Count: 8
American Indian/Native Alaskan31.2%26.1%36.3%
Asian12.2%8.8%15.6%
Black39.1%30.9%47.3%
Pacific Islander12.8%7.2%18.4%
White8.9%8.4%9.4%
Two or More Races11.3%8.8%13.8%
All Races10.2%9.7%10.7%
U.S.14.0%13.9%14.1%

Data Notes

Persons in race categories are only those who selected a single race. The ACS data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value.

Data Sources

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census
  • American Community Survey


Percentage of Persons Living in Poverty by Ethnicity, Utah, 2016

::chart - missing::
confidence limits

Data from the 2016 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates Table S1701.
EthnicityPercentage of PersonsLower LimitUpper Limit
Record Count: 4
Hispanic or Latino17.6%15.7%19.5%
White, Non-Hispanic8.1%7.6%8.6%
All Utahns10.2%9.7%10.7%
U.S.14.0%13.9%14.1%

Data Notes

Hispanic persons may be of any race. The ACS data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value.

Data Sources

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census
  • American Community Survey

More Resources and Links

Evidence-based community health improvement ideas and interventions may be found at the following sites:

Additional indicator data by state and county may be found on these Websites:

Medical literature can be queried at the PubMed website.

For an on-line medical dictionary, click on this Dictionary link.

Page Content Updated On 02/05/2018, Published on 02/12/2018
The information provided above is from the Department of Health's Center for Health Data IBIS-PH web site (http://ibis.health.state.gov). The information published on this website may be reproduced without permission. Please use the following citation: " Retrieved Tue, 17 July 2018 1:38:07 from Department of Health, Center for Health Data, Indicator-Based Information System for Public Health Web site: http://ibis.health.state.gov ".

Content updated: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 15:34:25 MST